Tax cuts: To cut or not to cut?
In September, amid a climate of startling interest rates, UK Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng announced a series of tax cuts, including the reduction of the top personal income tax rate that applies to those earning more than £150,000 from 45% to 40%. Just ten days later, following market turmoil that saw the British Pound drop at one point to a low of $1.035 USD, its lowest level since 1985, the decision was reversed calling the cuts “a massive distraction.”
Heading into the 2022-23 Federal Budget on 25 October, the question for the Australian Government is different. It is not whether to introduce personal income tax cuts but whether to keep, amend or repeal the cuts legislated to commence on 1 July 2024.
In Australia, the 2018-19 Budget introduced the Personal Income Tax Plan. The plan implemented three stages of income tax cuts over seven years that will, by 2024-25, simplify the tax brackets and enable taxpayers to earn up to $200,000 before paying a new top marginal tax rate of 45%. Stages of the plan, bringing relief for low and middle income earners, were brought forward in the 2019-20 Budget and again in 2020-21.
Labor’s pre-election Lower Taxes policy states, “An Albanese Labor Government will deliver tax relief for more than 9 million Australians through the legislated tax cuts that benefit everyone with incomes above $45,000.” But this month, the Treasurer has subtly changed the narrative from simply “our policy has not changed on stage three tax cuts” to “We do need to ensure that spending in the Budget, particularly in these uncertain global times, is geared toward what’s affordable and sustainable and responsible and sufficiently targeted. I think that’s one of the lessons from the UK.”
The public appeal of repealing the final stage three tax cuts is understandable. Back in 2018-19 when the plan was first introduced, the economy was in surplus and Australia was yet to feel the effects of a global pandemic, environmental extremities, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The tax cuts forego around $240bn of tax revenue over the next 10 years, and because it is percentage based, favours high income earners. The public policy think tank, the Grattan Institute, previously warned that if the government progressed with the stage three cuts “Australia’s income tax system will be less progressive than it’s been since the 1950s”.
Conversely, the rationale for reforming the current personal income tax regime where the highest marginal tax rate applies from around 2.5 times average full-time earnings (compared to around 4 times in Canada and 8 times in the US), is also understandable. When it comes to international competitiveness, New Zealand’s top marginal tax rate is 33% (from $180,000) and Singapore’s is 22%, increasing to 24% in 2023-24. If implemented, stage 3 of the income tax plan would see around 95% of taxpayers paying a marginal tax rate of 30% or less.
The 1 July 2024 tax cuts
Stage three of the Personal Income Tax Plan is legislated to take effect from 1 July 2024.
|
Tax thresholds: Australian resident taxpayers |
|
Tax rate |
2022-23 |
From 1 July 2024 |
0% |
$0 – $18,200 |
$0 – $18,200 |
19% |
$18,201 – $45,000 |
$18,201 – $45,000 |
30% |
|
$45,001 – $200,000 |
32.5% |
$45,001 – $120,000 |
|
37% |
$120,001 – $180,000 |
|
45% |
>$180,000 |
>$200,000 |
What the tax stats say
Personal income and withholding tax represents around 48% of the annual Commonwealth tax collections. Company tax, by comparison, is around 16%, and the goods and services tax (GST) just under 15% of total tax revenue collected.
Australia has a progressive personal tax system. That is, those with higher incomes pay not only a higher amount of tax, but a higher proportion of their income in tax. As a result, the 3.6% of taxpayers with taxable incomes of over $180,000 pay 31.6% of the total.
Where to from here?
The second 2022-23 Federal Budget will be announced on 25 October 2022. If the Government make no mention of the stage three tax cuts, they have another opportunity to refine their position in the 2023-24 Federal Budget released in May 2023, more than a year before the 1 July 2024 tax cuts come into effect.
Do you have a question?
Latest Blog Articles
Investing in gold: A timeless asset
This article discusses why investors turn to gold during volatile economic times, the benefits and consequences of investing in gold, interesting historical examples of gold stockpiling, and options for modern investors to get exposure to this asset class. – Investing in gold: A timeless asset.
Retirement mapping for millennials
This article outlines the challenges facing millennials in Australia today, who are trying to plan for their retirement as they battle cost of living rises. – Retirement mapping for millennials.
Debt repayment plan
This article provides tips and strategies for creating a debt repayment plan, including creating a budget, prioritising high-interest debt, and choosing a repayment strategy, and includes a case study to demonstrate the benefits of creating a debt repayment plan. – Debt repayment plan.
Retirement: The longest holiday of your life
This article outlines ways people can plan for their retirement. It examines what to budget for, how to do it and why readiness means more than finances. – Retirement: The longest “holiday” of your life.
The ‘Super’ Wars
A consultation paper released by Treasury has sparked a national debate about the role, purpose and access to superannuation ahead of the 2023-24 Federal Budget. – The ‘Super’ Wars.
Money, Kids & Apps
This article focuses on teaching kids about money. It focuses on smartphone apps taking over and the role of visiting the bank with a full piggy bank becoming obsolete.
Superannuation for the suddenly single
In this article we cover five steps to boost your super and make sure your divorce doesn’t derail your financial future. – Superannuation for the suddenly single.
The material and contents provided in this publication are informative in nature only.
It is not intended to be advice and you should not act specifically on the basis of this information alone. If expert assistance is required, professional advice should be obtained.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation